<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faulty recruitment process. Who&#8217;s to blame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.goyello.com/2009/05/18/faulty-recruitment-process-whos-to-blame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.goyello.com/2009/05/18/faulty-recruitment-process-whos-to-blame/</link>
	<description>Sharing our daily IT experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:03:22 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aga Gibowska</title>
		<link>http://blog.goyello.com/2009/05/18/faulty-recruitment-process-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Aga Gibowska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goyello.com/?p=231#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Kasia, thanks for your comment. Fully agree. I guess that the only way to &quot;feel&quot; the candidate during the interview is to avoid asking hypothetical question and make the interview more behavioral, focusing on past experiences. But this will be the subject of my next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kasia, thanks for your comment. Fully agree. I guess that the only way to &#8220;feel&#8221; the candidate during the interview is to avoid asking hypothetical question and make the interview more behavioral, focusing on past experiences. But this will be the subject of my next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasia Szemro</title>
		<link>http://blog.goyello.com/2009/05/18/faulty-recruitment-process-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasia Szemro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.goyello.com/?p=231#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Good points, Aga. In my opinion there are two most risky factors and the most difficult to manage at the same time: 
1. Screening the candidate&#039;s competences (how can you check what he/she really can: leadership, teamwork, crativity etc.). Mostly, a test or an interview is not enough.... you have to &quot;feel&quot; it. The recruiter has to be able to verify when the candidate is telling the truth and when not. 
2. Giving the candidate the chance to get to know your company well enough to be able to decide whether it&#039;s the place for him/her. When an employee feels right at work, then the work results are much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Aga. In my opinion there are two most risky factors and the most difficult to manage at the same time:<br />
1. Screening the candidate&#8217;s competences (how can you check what he/she really can: leadership, teamwork, crativity etc.). Mostly, a test or an interview is not enough&#8230;. you have to &#8220;feel&#8221; it. The recruiter has to be able to verify when the candidate is telling the truth and when not.<br />
2. Giving the candidate the chance to get to know your company well enough to be able to decide whether it&#8217;s the place for him/her. When an employee feels right at work, then the work results are much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
